For music to be profound, it must not only refer, it must say something profound about the profound, and that music can never do p. This work will be especially helpful to both professionals and advanced students of aesthetics.
In chapter 5 Kivy defends the Propositional Theory of Literary Truth, arguing that literature, unlike music, conveys "propositions about the world that are to be assessed as true or false" p.
Music was not a fine art, merely an agreeable one pp. Turning to Danto, who holds that art is defined in reference to theory, so that it is always meaningful to ask of any work "what is it about?
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder. In chapters 6 and 7, Kivy turns his attention to music and to the ways it has been misconstrued by analogy with the literary arts.
He not only provides the reader with a detailed historical analysis of the history of aesthetics from Plato to Danto and Walton, but in his pursuit of the differences between the arts, introduces a novel and compelling approach that will no doubt influence current debates.
Cambridge University Press, Copyright Gale, Cengage Learning. In his first two chapters, Kivy traces the search for the definition of art from the Enlightenment until now, and argues the quest has been a failure.
Philosophers had two options: Retrieved Sep 18 from https: An Essay in Differences. Kivy is not arguing the Wittgensteinian position that the search for sameness ought to be abandoned as impossible.
Nonetheless, variations on expression theory stemming from Hegel came to dominate the first half of the twentieth century. In chapter 7 Kivy argues that the unique virtue of music is not that it is analogous to the other arts in having content, but that music is liberating precisely because it has no content.
Reid and Schopenhauer readily accommodate music as representative respectively of human sentiment and "metaphysical will. Though it can be held that in music form is content, in literature content can be distinguished from form. The principle function of literary descriptions is to inform; they need not evoke any mental image.
In chapter 6 Kivy argues that music cannot be profound in the way that literature can. Mark Starr, Spring Hill College. For Hegel, music is "the expression of the inner life" p. His hope is to balance our search for commonality with a study of differences among the arts.
For "in looking for differences, the search for sameness is forwarded rather than thwarted" p. An Essay in Differences.Read Online Philosophies Of Arts An Essay In Differences as free as you can Discover the key to include the lifestyle by reading this Philosophies Of Arts An Essay In Differences This is a kind of baby book that you require currently.
The Philosophical Review () (1): killarney10mile.com Views Icon Views. Philosophies of Arts: An Essay in Differences Since the beginning of the eighteenth century, the philosophy of art has been engaged in the project of defining fine arts by finding out what they have in killarney10mile.com: $ He offers a fruitful change of strategy: instead of engaging in an obsessive quest for sameness, let us explore the differences between the arts.
He presents five case studies, three from literature, two from music. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Philosophies of Arts: An Essay in Differences | Preface 1. How We Got Here, and Why 2. Where we are 3. Reading and representation 4.
On the unity of form and content 5.
The laboratory of fictional truth 6. The quest for musical profundity 7. The liberation of music Epilogue Notes Bibliography. Philosophies of arts: an essay in differences.
[Peter Kivy] -- Since the beginning of the eighteenth century the philosophy of art has been engaged in the project of finding out what the fine arts might have in common, and thus how they might be defined.Download